Now that we understand that it is not proper to call all non-Muslims "infidels," is it all moot? Does it all not matter because, as I have been told time and again, Islam calls for the murder of non-Muslims? I mean this perception is so pervasive and entrenched in the minds of many people. "Well," I am sure many are saying to me, "it is because of the fact that all terrorists are Muslims." That's not actually the case, but judging by the media reporting, I can understand this perception.
Still, I really do not know from where the contention that Islam says "kill the infidels" comes.
"It is the Qur'an, you idiot!!!" I am quite sure some of you just screamed that to your computer screen. Really? Where? I do not know of one verse which directs the believers to kill all "infidels." Yet, I am constantly reminded of the contrary, such as this verse:
"Now when you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks until you overcome them fully..." (47:4).
Or this one:
"O you who have attained to faith! Fight against those unbelievers who are near you and let them find you adamant, and know that God is with those who are conscious of Him" (9:123).
Or this one:
"O Prophet! Strive hard (lit., make "jihad") against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be adamant with them... " (66:73).
Yet, perhaps the "poster child" of all the verses in the Qur'an which are cited as evidence that Islam calls for the murder of infidels is this one, the so-called "Verse of the Sword":
"Slay the pagans wherever you may come upon them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every conceivable place..." (9:5).
Case closed? Wrong. These verses have a context, and when understood in their proper context, it will become quite clear that the verses cited above are not a carte blanche for Muslims to kill all non-Muslims.
Before I address specific verses, however, a few general principles of the Qur'an when it comes to fighting must be explained. Also, I rely almost exclusively upon Muhammad Asad's explanation of the Qur'an as my source material. Let us begin, then.
In the Qur'an, the principle of fighting is purely self-defensive. According to all available Traditions, the earliest verses revealed with regards to fighting are these:
"Permission [to fight] is given to those against whom war is being wrongfully waged and, verily, God has indeed the power to succour them; those who have been driven from their homelands against all right for no other reason than their saying, 'Our sustainer is God!'" (22:39-40).
Along with this verse is 2:190, which says:
"And fight in God's cause against those who wage war against you..."
Thus, it is quite clear that fighting is to be done in self-defense. Now, anyone can commit acts of terror and aggression and say, "it's in self-defense." In fact, that is precisely what Al Qaeda is doing: they claim by killing 3,000 people in New York City and Washington, D.C., they are "defending" the Muslim nation against "Zionist and Crusader" aggression against the Muslims. What sheer rubbish, the product of a sick and twisted criminal mind.
The Qur'an clearly states, in the remainder of 2:190 it says:
"...but do not commit aggression, for verily, God does not love aggressors."
"Committing aggression" includes killing innocent civilians in Tel Aviv, Beslan, New York, Baghdad, or wherever. Furthermore, when the enemy ceases its hostility, fighting must cease:
"...but if they desist, then all hostility shall cease, save against those who [willfully] do wrong" (2:193).
Another verse repeats this insistence that hostility must cease when the enemy stops its aggression against you:
"But if they [the enemy] incline to peace, incline thou to it as well, and place thy trust in God: verily, He alone is all-hearing, all-knowing! And should they seek but to deceive thee [by their show of peace] - behold, God is enough for thee! He it is who has strengthened thee with His succour, and by giving thee believing followers" (8:61-62).
Thus, even if the enemy is feigning a peaceful posture, the Muslims are still commanded to cease hostility and "place their trust in God." Thus, it is quite clear that fighting is in self-defense, and aggression is not allowed. Now, Muslims have waged wars of aggression in the past, for sure, and they even called them "jihad against the infidels" in order to justify their desire for territorial expansion. In fact, one of the most pertinent examples of this was the Ummayad Dynasty, which enacted a policy of "jihad" as perpetual warfare. But, such a policy is not Islamically correct, and as the collapse of the Ummayad Dynasty showed, not sustainable.
Still, the point of the matter is, the framework underlying fighting in Islam is self-defense, and all other verses which deal with fighting or call on the believers to "fight the unbelievers" must be understood in this framework.
Yet, this begs the question: why are these verses even in the Qur'an at all? Why fight at all? What was the historical context of these verses of the Qur'an which tell the believers to "fight the unbelievers"? It was a very violent one.
From the very beginnings of his ministry, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was violently opposed by his people. They tortured and even killed some of his followers. They never relented in their violent oppostion for more than 13 years, including a boycott of him and his family that ended up costing the lives of his uncle - who protected him - and his beloved wife, Khadijah. This opposition culminated in the expulsion of the Prophet north to the city of Yathrib.
Even after he left, the Meccans attacked the Muslims time and again, waging several battles against the Prophet and his followers. The pagan tribes attempted to assassinate the Prophet on several occasions, in fact. (For a more detailed account of the Prophet's story, see here.)
It is in this violent context that the verse 9:5 was revealed, and we will go into a full explanation in the next post (or two)...
Filed under: Islamic Belief
Tags: context, infidel, interpretation, Islam, Khadijah, kill, misconception, Prophet Muhammad, Quran, slay, terrorists, understanding, Yathrib
- Will red tailed hawks eat chickens
- Why are gangs so influential in prisons
- Why are you always eating poison
- Are dotted condom painful for any girl
- Do programmers make more money than astronauts
- Is Kroger cheaper than Walmart
- Is air a solution 1
- Do surgeons have a psychotic personality
- How do you pull a reverse heist
- Where can I find weed in Jodhpur
- What are some facts about selfish people
- Are admissions difficult in 10th standard
- Who is Baker Hughes
- What is the Russian word for painter
- Do the Gulf countries really practice slavery
- Why does hydrogen not have neutrons
- When is solitude a pleasurable experience
- What is an exhaustive range in functions